Posts Tagged RTS
Because one screen is not enough, even more people don’t only watch TV passively anymore. Laptop on the knees, it became normal to surf on the web while watching intermittently TV.
Nowadays, the so-called Second Screen applications appear on our tablets, giving additional informations linked with the TV’s main program. Useful ?
A familiy watching religiously at TV in the 50’s. Past times. Nowadays, one screen is not enough anymore.
What does the Second Screen brings to us viewers ?
The second screen provides additional informations, in link with what you’re watching on your TV. An international example are the 2012 London Olympics, an event during witch several main TVs transmitted content about the results of the athletes during the broadcasting on the Second Screen.
The Guardian Second Screen, on tablet
Second Screen experiences in Switzerland
A swiss example : the RTS “deuxième écran”
In February 2012, the Radio Télévision Suisse launch its own Second Screen system. Up to now, only one program uses the application : the daily evening news “19:30”. During the program, each time a report is broadcasted, complements become available on the application.
Lets have a look at how it works :
From the RTS website mainpage “deuxième écran” section can be found in “Les plus du web”
Or, it’s possible to acess to it directly following this link.
How does the RTS “deuxième écran” looked like for today’s 19:30 ?
Want to know more about Christian Varone topic ? The second screen gives you more elements.
The second screen doesn’t only proposes texts, but also graphics (for the elections periods for example), videos, pictures galleries, and all wich supports the web can provide.
A video made by the RTS about the “deuxième écran” at the moment of it’s launch :
Playing with Second Screen
In December, the RTS will launch it’s new general culture game “Les Imbattables”.
The game itself isn’t very innovative (teams composed by a kid and a senior try to answer questions in a quiz). What’s new is the possibility for the viewer to answer actively to the questions on a tablet, trough the Second Screen. As the question is displayed on the TV screen, it appears also on the tablet with the possibility to answer to it.
RTS future game “Les Imbattables” will use since December 2012 the Second Screen technology.
Usefull, the Second Screen ?
Looking at the swiss example of the 19:30 “Deuxième écran”, it certainly provides some additional informations. The graphics are for example interesting, since they appear quite quickly on TV, sometimes too fast to be analysed properly.
But it appears that most of the content of this RTS Second Screen remains quite light, with just short texts, and the videos simply come from the swiss television website. There are no additional videos coming from youtube or dailymotion, no links : nothing that can really bring the user to new way of knowledge.
The Second Screen is but quite a new born. Some time more should be needed in order to see the concept further developed in the future. The TV broadcasters believe in the future of this technology. As does for example David Wertheimer, president of digital at Fox :
The second screen discussion we’ve been having is just one piece of a strategy that’s all about giving our audiences an opportunity to talk about the shows and share thoughts with the showrunners and the talent. To us, that’s what television in the 21st century is all about.
David Wertheimer, president of digital at Fox, believes in the future of the Second Screen.
Are you using Second Screen ? Or do you want to stay an oldschool « couch potatoe » ?
Before Second Screen: couch potatoes. What’s the best ?
With the rise of the Web 2.0, more and more people get to express themselves on the Internet: by contributing to a personal blog, answering to a poll on a website or making comments on any event the web is talking about. Today, those contributions can be neatly managed by news organisations to make you participate to their news production. And this is the object of this blog’s entry: crowdsourcing the news.
The crowd likes to be involved
Jeff Howe is the man who coined the term “crowdsourcing” in 2006 in an article called “The Rise of crowdsourcing.” At the time he was a contributing editor of the Wired magazine. Now he tends to be perceived as The Crowdsourcing expert. But you may wonder…
What is crowdsourcing?
As Jeff Howe well expressed it, crowdsourcing is a process of involving the public, the crowd, into a task by an open call. And this process if often made through a website. The definition could include many sorts of calls, indeed. To a large extent, crowdsourcing can be applied to solving a scientific problem, as the company InnoCentive started to do in 2001, or as IStockphotos managed in outsourcing the task of photographing an event to a voluntary crowd instead of hiring a professional photographer for instance.
Crowdsourcing takes many forms. But one thing makes it unique: it empowers the crowd. As the crowd represents different brains, different competences, it can be even more creative, efficient, innovative and influent than a single man working in his office on a task he has no grasp into.
How news organisations make the most of it?
In the context of Journalism, you can well imagine that the journalist and the news organisation one can work for were primarily the only gatekeepers of news, and you were waiting for them to be informed. If there was a place for you to communicate with the newspaper, there was the “letters to the editor”, and not many more.
Today news organisations have their websites. Moreover, if you give a closer look to them, you will notice they even make a space for you to act and communicate. Not by solely adding comments. There is more!
In England, the BBC has launched Have your Say ; in the USA, CNN opened iReport. And the Swiss news organisations are not the last: The RTS has Vos infos and The 20minutes has the Lecteur-Reporter’s platform. All fell in the new trend. They all let you the chance to be part of their work, or in other words: now the news need you.
As a million of events happen across the world, reporters and journalists cannot cover them all. This is where the audience is powerful: it can improve their coverage.
When terrorists set off a series of bombs on buses and subways in London, who produced the most riveting images and sound bites? The passengers and their cell phones.”  When an accident occur next to your home, or on your way to work, you are the first witness of the event and no professional reporter could catch the same tension you were able to grasp when it happens.
With a single photo, a video, a short message, you can make a newsroom get up. You can even make it change its editorial agenda.
For Bernard Rappaz, Editor in chief at the RTS in Switzerland, crowdsourcing makes a news media quicker than before. Using Twitter, Facebook, and their crowdsourcing tool on their website, the members of the newsroom can compete with the news agencies they are sometimes dependent on. As Mathieu Coutaz confirms himself: it allows the staff to be the first on the scene and to be always closer to the stories that interest the people their work for.
Mathieu Coutaz is the content manager for 20minutes online in the French-speaking part of Switzerland. The 20minutes is The daily newspaper distributed in Switzerland and this, for free. Its platform “lecteur-reporteur” has been launched in 2006 and the newspaper rewards any contributions that it eventually publishes on its web. What is most, “50% to 70% of the contributions that are selected go on the print edition” Mathieu Coutaz explains. And he emphasises one fundamental point that cannot be neglected: your photos and stories go through a process of verification before getting anything done. “When verified, the contributions of the audience can influence the editorial agenda on the temporal and hierarchical aspects. If it has to be treated before another news, and if the story is worth being published at the top of our agenda, then of course we do it.”
Crowdsourcing does not ask readers to become anything more than what they’ve always been: eyewitness to their daily lives.
In that sense the news organisations save their first role of gatekeepers: the readers don’t write the stories, they only contribute to it: the final decision of its treatement and broadcast still lies in the professional’s hands.
Crowdsourcing at risks
In an interesting article, Darren Gilbert warns that “crowdsourcing can be as advantageous as it can be dangerous.” Although readers are willing to contribute to the news, some are able to get a journalist on the wrong track. He takes the example of a recent scandal that occurred in the United States: a company named Journatic published news gathered from the public. And there were actually wrong!
In Switzerland, all the news platforms I discovered ask for the name and mail address of the contributors, in order to be able to get back to him/her. A mail address can be fake, indeed, but in any case, Swiss news organsations do the verification before publishing, which can avoid some serious faux pas.
To cope it all, crowdsourcing may well bring the public and the news organisation closer than before. It may establish a new relationship between the public and the news media: a trust that could have been lost. But it still needs to be well used in order not to lose what crowdsourcing is for journalism: a relevant tool to make the crowd part of the work, for a better and substantial result.
I am now turning to you
Have you ever contributed to the news of your local newspaper?
What do you think of the crowdsourcing concept regarding journalism?
And to go further…
A new trend in crowdsourcing is for journalists to use special crowdsourcing platforms to gather the information they couldn’t find from their places, such as Ushahidi‘s platform, specialised in mapping crowdsourcing information.
The TED talks also got into the crowdsourcing concept, here is a talk held by Paul Lewis about the impact of crowdsourcing the news for investigative journalism.
And to be always up to date with the last seminars about crowdsourcing and journalism, have a look at the European Journalism Center’s website, it’s worth it!
By Céline Bilardo
 Howe, J. 2008. Crowdsourcing: Why the power of the crowd is driving the future of business. 1st ed. USA: Ed.Crown Business. p.212.
N’oubliez pas de participer au débat à la fin de l’article!
Raphaël Girardin et Fabien Feissli
1982, finale de la coupe de Suisse, le FC Sion affronte Bâle. Devant son poste de télévision Marcel Kuchta, 9 ans, est captivé. «Les Valaisans ont gagné 1-0, depuis ce moment je suis fan du FC Sion.» Mais le futur journaliste sportif n’est pas seulement fan du club sédunnois. Il adore le sport sous toutes ses formes. Le regarder et le raconter. Selon ses mots, il ne se jugeait «pas assez bon» pour jouer lui-même. Alors, petit déjà, il racontait le sport. «Je regardais les matchs de la Suisse et je faisais des comptes rendus».
Journaliste sportif à la RTS, Philippe Von Burg explique pourquoi il a choisi ce métier
“Une activité ludique”
Aujourd’hui spécialisé dans le hockey et le cyclisme à l’Aargauer Zeitung, Marcel Kuchta a appris son métier sur le tas. Comme il se plaît à le dire, «Mon école c’est le terrain». Il n’a pas fait d’études et d’ailleurs ne les juge pas vraiment utiles. Ayant réussi à faire de son hobby son métier, le journaliste argovien aime le côté diversifié de son travail. Il apprécie aussi les voyages pour suivre les rencontres sportives. Certes il est souvent absent le soir, mais il trouve ça plutôt pratique. «Ainsi je suis présent la journée pour la vie de famille».
Journaliste sportif à la RTS, Philippe Von Burg décrit son quotidien
Pour Marcel Kuchta, le journalisme sportif se distingue de ses homologues régionaux, économiques ou politiques. «Le sport reste une activité ludique. C’est avant tout des émotions que nous devons retranscrire et mettre en perspective. C’est une rubrique moins sérieuse que les autres.» Une activité dans laquelle l’Argovien s’épanouit pleinement. «J’aime raconter des histoires. L’écrit à cette qualité qu’il offre plus de possibilités pour développer un sentiment.»
Métier ou passion?
S’il avoue qu’il est plus facile pour une femme de pratiquer son métier – «face aux hommes les sportifs ont plus de peine à laisser sortir leurs émotions» – il n’est pourtant pas en reste au niveau des bons souvenirs. Des championnats du monde de hockey à Québec au cinq Tour de France qu’il a couverts, difficile pour l’Argovien d’en retenir qu’un seul. «Il y a quand même eu la finale de Wimbledon 2007 entre Federer et Nadal. Elle se disputait en marge du prologue de Londres et j’ai eu la chance d’y assister.»
Journaliste sportif à la RTS, Philippe Von Burg évoque son salaire
Nul doute que Marcel Kuchta a trouvé le métier de ses rêves. Des terrains de troisième ligue de ses débuts, à la fournaise du Colisée de Québec, il est toujours resté un féru de sport. Si bien qu’aussitôt la journée de travail terminée, il se pose devant sa télévision pour suivre les matches de NHL.
Quant à savoir s’il se voit finir sa vie au sein de l’Aargauer Zeitung, il n’hésite pas longtemps. «C’est difficile de trouver mieux, mais si le Tages Anzeiger ou la NZZ me faisait une offre, j’y réfléchirais sûrement à deux fois.»
Participez au débat en donnant votre avis sur les questions ci-dessous ou sur un autre élément de l’article dans la partie commentaire:
Comme le demandait Thy Nguyen, le sport est-il une rubrique exclusivement masculine? Pour les journalistes? Pour le public?
Dans quel pays les journalistes sportifs vous font le plus vibrer? Et que pensez-vous de ceux de la RTS?
Répondez aussi à notre sondage:
L’intégralité de l’interview de Philippe Von Burg
–Le site de l’Aargauer Zeitung: http://www.aargauerzeitung.ch/
-Suivez Marcel Kuchta sur Twitter: https://twitter.com/Guggti
-Ou sur Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/marcel.kuchta